• A dispensary can obtain bud from a patient of the own caregiver, however, only if the individual or caregiver receives no reimbursement for nova scotia cannabis.
• No ingestion of marijuana is allowed on the land of their dispensary. The Department should first give fair notice of this review to the dispensary.
The Arizona law is by no means just like the legislation in California. There are certainly a few differences between them both, though in certain respects they’re comparable. That is a comparative evaluation of both laws.
• Both legislation, as a practical matter, let for broad discretion on the part of a doctor to prescribe marijuana to those that suffer with pain. From the Arizona legislation,”acute and chronic pain” is the legislated standard.
• Both laws have numerous disorders that are automatically considered qualifying disorders for its prescription of medical marijuana.
• Both laws require using an identification card from people who’ve been prescribed medical marijuana, following the cardholders have gone through a first application procedure where the usage of this medication was recommended by a doctor.
• Both countries don’t variable in the unusable part of the marijuana plant in specifying the most weight of marijuana that’s permissible for ownership with a cardholder.
• Although the principles have never been finalized, the Arizona law seems as if it is going to be governed on the state level and so uniform across Arizona. The California legislation, however, is governed considerably on the municipal level, and so the rules about dispensaries may fluctuate greatly from 1 municipality to another.
• The Arizona legislation provides a wider spectrum of individuals that are regarded as a”doctor” for the purpose of prescribing medical marijuana. Back in California, only medical doctors and osteopaths are thought of as doctors. In Arizona, along with medical doctors and osteopaths, naturopaths and homeopaths are also allowed to prescribe medical marijuana.